Our verdict

We found the Diadora Cellula to be a daily trainer blending a bold retro-modern aesthetic with premium materials that feel great from the first step. We were impressed by its plush comfort and long-lasting build, though the narrow toebox will be a deal-breaker for many. And despite superb stability, we must confess that its low energy return didn’t match our expectations set by its high price.

Pros

  • Premium materials
  • Outstanding long-term durability
  • Soft and comfortable ride
  • Exceptional heel stability
  • Max-stack cushioning
  • Reliable all-weather grip
  • Unique retro styling
  • Traditional rocker profile

Cons

  • Pricier than competitors
  • Lacks flexibility
  • Not a responsive ride at all
  • Narrow fit

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

After completing our full round of lab tests and test runs, we concluded that the Cellula is a solid choice for:

  • Runners with narrow feet seeking a daily trainer made from premium-quality materials
  • Fans of retro-inspired designs who want a max-stack shoe that can also serve as a stylish sneaker.
  • Those willing to spend more for exceptional durability and top-tier craftsmanship.

Diadora Cellula

Who should NOT buy

We do not recommend the cellula for runners chasing a lively, speed-oriented ride. After lab testing, we found its energy return surprisingly low. Shoes like the Adidas Adizero EVO SL or Under Armour Infinite Elite 2 deliver a much bouncier experience with similar stack heights.

We also believe the narrow toebox is a major drawback. In our experience, it feels restrictive for those who enjoy a roomy fit, and we think better options exist, like the Adidas Ultraboost 5 or ASICS Noosa Tri 16.

Diadora Cellula parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

The Diadora Cellula delivers solid shock absorption for heel strikers, handling both short efforts and long runs with ease thanks to its 132 SA cushioning. Remarkably, the forefoot nearly matches the heel, boasting a massive 128 SA that blows past the average.

Diadora Cellula Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Cellula 132 SA
Average 128 SA
Compared to 243 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
170 SA

Energy return

New

Energy return is one of the Cellula’s weakest points, much like we found with the Diadora Atomo Star in our lab. Here, the EVA-based ANIMA foam delivered just 48.7% in the heel and 51.6% in the forefoot, which is far below most competitors and definitely not what you’d expect for this price.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Cellula 48.7%
Average 58.3%
Compared to 240 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
82.0%

Heel stack

Despite not appearing that tall before we cut the Cellula in half, we were amazed to find a 41.9 mm stack height. 

This firmly places the Cellula in max-stack daily trainer territory, joining models like the Hoka Clifton 10 in what seems to be the new standard for running shoes.

Diadora Cellula Heel stack
Test results
Cellula 41.9 mm
Average 34.4 mm
Compared to 435 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

If the heel impressed you, wait for the forefoot: we measured a substantial 34.7 mm of stack height here.

Diadora Cellula side

Given the already high shock absorption in this area, we think this shoe is perfect for runners who want maximum foam under the ball of the foot and aren’t concerned about ground feel or a proprioception-rich ride.

Diadora Cellula Forefoot stack
Test results
Cellula 34.7 mm
Average 25.8 mm
Compared to 435 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.5 mm

Drop

Diadora lists the Cellula with a 5 mm drop, but we measured it at 7.2 mm. This remains a moderate drop and won’t significantly affect the ride, especially given the exceptionally high forefoot stack.

Diadora Cellula Drop
Test results
Cellula 7.2 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 435 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Despite its high price, the Cellula isn’t positioned as a premium model in Diadora’s lineup, which still reserves the top spot for shoes equipped with ANIMA N2 and ANIMA PBX foams. Instead, it relies on a more basic EVA compound simply named ANIMA.

This foam offers a notably soft ride at just 14.5 HA, cushioning landings comfortably during easy runs. However, as we’ve observed in our lab testing, it delivers limited energy return, making it less suitable for performance-driven sessions.

Diadora Cellula Midsole softness
Test results
Cellula 14.5 HA
Average 20.7 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 361 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

Rocker

From the side profile, the Diadora Cellula shows a classic rocker shape with minimal curvature in both the forefoot and heel.

This design keeps the platform relatively flat, making it an excellent choice for runners who prefer a more traditional feel underfoot rather than the aggressive, forward-rolling sensation of modern rockered shoes. And it definitely suits well the retro aesthetic of the shoe!

Diadora Cellula Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

Diadora, as a 100% Italian brand, often designs running shoes with a snug fit that works perfectly for runners with narrow or low-volume feet... but not for everyone else.

This holds true for the Cellula, as our cooled gel mold measured only 92.1 mm in width.

Diadora Cellula Width / Fit
Test results
Cellula 92.1 mm
Average 95.3 mm
Compared to 190 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
102.4 mm

Toebox width

We took a second measurement in the toebox to better assess the Cellula’s fit, and true to its DNA, we found another below-average reading at 71.1 mm. It's clear that this shoe is best suited for runners with narrow feet.

Diadora Cellula Toebox width
Test results
Cellula 71.1 mm
Average 73.5 mm
Compared to 190 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.4 mm

Toebox height

The toebox height is also quite low at 24.7 mm.

Runners with low-volume feet or those who don’t typically raise their big toe should be fine, but others might find this design quite restrictive.

Diadora Cellula Toebox height
Test results
Cellula 24.7 mm
Average 27.3 mm
Compared to 189 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
33.9 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

New

We tested the Duratech 5000 rubber and found it scored an impressive 0.55 in our lab test. With this result, the Cellula offers reliable performance on both dry and rainy days throughout the year.

Test results
Cellula 0.55
Average 0.46
Compared to 234 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.83

Outsole design

New

The outsole combines black Duratech 5000 rubber segments with some exposed areas to reduce weight. Rubber is placed in high-wear zones at the heel, midfoot, and forefoot, with deep horizontal and vertical grooves that work wonders to channel water away on rainy days.

Diadora Cellula Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

New

Despite featuring multiple grooves in the outsole, the Cellula is far from a flexible shoe. Its 17.2N score in our 30-degree bend test rivals that of some carbon-plated models, making it less appealing for runners who prefer a more natural feel underfoot.

Diadora Cellula Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Cellula 17.2N
Average 15.0N
Compared to 237 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

Despite its high stack height, Diadora managed to keep the Cellula’s weight at 9.8 oz (278g). While not remarkable and heavier than many rivals, the padded upper and retro design demand denser materials, yet it still stays under the 10-ounce mark.

Diadora Cellula Weight
Test results
Cellula 9.8 oz (278g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 436 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.6 oz (159g)
Weight
12.6 oz (357g)

Breathability

The retro-inspired design of the Cellula might not appear highly breathable, yet it uses modern materials like a thin engineered mesh that should provide decent airflow.

To confirm, we ran our smoke machine test and recorded a 3/5 score. Well, that's likely a bit warm on the hottest days, but comfortable most of the year.

The upper combines thin sections with thicker overlays for structure and its retro-modern aesthetic, which slightly limits ventilation.

Diadora Cellula microscope

Under the digital microscope, we found the engineered mesh to be the same type used in many current daily trainers, showing that while the style is retro, the materials are modern.

Diadora Cellula mesh

Handling the upper by hand, we were impressed by how thin the mesh actually is. Given this, the 3/5 result was surprising, though the absence of large ventilation holes clearly impacted the final score.

Test results
Cellula 3
Average 3.8
Compared to 365 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

Thanks to its extreme rigidity, the Cellula delivers impressive stability despite its towering stack height. This effect is particularly evident for heel strikers, as the shoe’s rear is noticeably wider than its forefoot and it also features tall sidewalls hugging the heel on the sides.

Torsional rigidity

The Cellula ranks among the most rigid daily trainers we’ve tested with a 5/5 score, virtually impossible to twist or bend, delivering a feel reminiscent of supertrainers like the ASICS Superblast 2.

Test results
Cellula 5
Average 3.4
Compared to 414 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter is exceptionally rigid with another 5/5, which helps explain the shoe’s stable feel during heel-first landings. However, runners sensitive to ultra-stiff counters are unlikely to find this setup comfortable, even despite the Hoka-inspired design to reduce pressure on the tendon.

Test results
Cellula 5
Average 2.9
Compared to 398 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

When we measured the forefoot at 114.6 mm, it immediately stood out. Given the high stack height, we anticipated a wider platform, but the narrow toebox means Diadora didn’t need to extend the midsole width to ~120 mm to keep the foot stable.

Diadora Cellula Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Cellula 114.6 mm
Average 114.3 mm
Compared to 436 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

Conversely, the heel comes in at a substantial 98.3 mm. Its interior width matches other competitors, and with the stack height here exceeding 40 mm, the added width makes sense for us—though it does give the ride a slightly clunkier feel.

Diadora Cellula Midsole width - heel
Test results
Cellula 98.3 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 436 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

Initially, we were concerned about the Cellula’s durability given its extremely thin engineered mesh. However, after subjecting it to our Dremel-based durability test, it earned a well-deserved 3/5 score, putting our worries to rest.

Test results
Cellula 3
Average 2.6
Compared to 299 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding absolutely aced our test, earning a flawless 5/5 score and leaving no doubt that the Cellula won’t be falling apart in this area anytime soon.

Test results
Cellula 5
Average 3.3
Compared to 294 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The Duratech 5000 outsole excelled in our test, showing only 0.6 mm of wear and confirming durability as one of the Cellula’s biggest strengths—a crucial factor when investing in a high-priced shoe.

Test results
Cellula 0.6 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 277 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

If there was any doubt about the outsole’s durability, Diadora addressed it with 2.9 mm of rubber. While slightly below the lab average, it’s more than sufficient for a shoe that performs this well against wear and tear.

Diadora Cellula Outsole thickness
Test results
Cellula 2.9 mm
Average 3.3 mm
Compared to 432 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The DDATTIVO insole reaches a substantial 7.5 mm in the heel, playing a key role in the shoe’s max-stack build. We also found it noteworthy that it features variable thickness, with the midfoot and forefoot offering a more average profile.

Diadora Cellula Insole thickness
Test results
Cellula 7.5 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 431 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.5 mm

Midsole softness in cold (%)

The ANIMA foam uses standard EVA, and as we confirmed in the lab, that typically means it turns brick-like in cold conditions. For the Cellula, the outcome was disappointing: a 52% increase in firmness after just 20 minutes in our freezer.

Diadora Cellula Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Cellula 52%
Average 25%
Compared to 360 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Removable insole

The stock insole is fully removable. This allows swapping it for a slimmer alternative from another shoe, which adds welcome room in an otherwise snug-fitting toebox.

Diadora Cellula Removable insole
Test results
Cellula Yes

Reflective elements

Diadora added five small reflective dots to the finger-loop heel tab, which is really cool.

Test results
Cellula Yes

Tongue padding

We found it fascinating that Diadora took the exact opposite approach with the Cellula’s tongue compared to the Atomo Star. Here, it’s a super-thin design with just 1.3 mm of padding, while its more expensive sibling boasts over 10 mm for an ultra-plush feel. Therefore, this shoe requires extra care each time you tighten the laces.

Diadora Cellula lacing system

The lacing system is straightforward, consisting of punched eyelets plus an extra one at the top for those who prefer a runner’s knot. Everything is well crafted, and like the rest of the shoe, the materials and quality control are excellent.

Diadora Cellula Tongue padding
Test results
Cellula 1.3 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 433 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue on the Cellula is not gusseted, which feels disappointing given its premium price. We believe a semi-gusseted design would have been a more fitting (and fair) choice for a shoe like this.

Diadora Cellula Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Cellula None

Price

The Diadora Cellula lacks the “Made in Italy” tag found on other Diadora models and it's made in Vietnam, making its premium price harder to justify. Ultimately, much like Italian cars, the Cellula is a purchase driven more by passion than by pure logic.

Test results
Cellula $170
Average $148
Compared to 436 running shoes
Number of shoes
$60
Price
$290

Heel tab

The heel tab of the Cellula is crafted from a soft, suede-like material stitched securely onto the heel collar. It provides a practical grip point for easy on-and-off while complementing the shoe’s retro-modern design aesthetic.

Diadora Cellula Heel tab
Test results
Cellula Finger loop